Home » Humans and mass extinction: who is the real victim?

Humans and mass extinction: who is the real victim?

by simon

It’s inevitable that at some stage, someone will say to me “why are you making animal conservation all about humans?” I sympathise with this view. When I see the suffering we inflict on wildlife, I too feel the world might be better off without us. But that would be the most anthropocentric view of all. When it comes to humans and mass extinction, it won’t help us.

To that person, I would say “humans are animals”.

Anthropocentrism, philosophical viewpoint arguing that human beings are the central or most significant entities in the world. Western religions and philosophies hold this basic belief. Anthropocentrism regards humans as separate from and superior to nature. Exploitation of animals, plants, mineral resources and so on, holds as human life has intrinsic value. Humankind exploits this for its own benefit.

Brittanica.com

Victims or equals?

If we try to preserve animals for their own sake we inevitably make them into victims. It’s a principal reason why we don’t take animal conservation seriously enough. It would be like society trying to address gender inequality without recognising that a society where men and women are equal is stronger. We should be giving everyone equal opportunity instead. Conservation is about mutual respect and compassion for other animals, as much as our society is about respect and compassion of other people and family.

If we try to preserve animals for their own sake, we inevitably make them into victims which I think is a principle reason why we don’t currently take animal conservation seriously-enough.

The European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) has shown gender equality can boost Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by over 10%. In a similar way, equality among animals maintains trophic pyramids, which boosts ecosystem productivity.

Our evolution and role alongside other animals

The evolution to Homo sapien happened about 300,000 years ago and we were one in a long line of animals. It happened because that was the outcome most likely to stabilise our planet’s ecosystems at the time. The only perspective we have is centred on ourselves, because we live inside our own human minds. As conservationists however, if we knowingly or even subconsciously view animals and people as separate, we are being as anthropocentric as those who care little about animals at all.

Humans and mass extinction
An orangutan rests in a tree in southern Kalimantan, Borneo. As many as 100,000 Bornean Orangutans, half all remaining, were exterminated in the 16 years between 1999 and 2015. We share about 97% of our DNA with orangutans but it’s not that surprising, since we also share 85% of our DNA with dogs. We tend to think of genes as the ultimate coding for our existence but genetics is only one part of our make-up. The way we bond with, and therefore survive in the world, is mostly through our behaviour because this connects us with patterns of food availability. We develop physical abilities that both conform with, and control our outside world. Orangutans, for example, are both cultivators and consumers of forest fruits and contribute to the structure and stability of tropical rainforests. Our physical similarity to orangutans reminds us that we have the same origins and connection to other animals, with whom we share the planet. Drawing, Simon Mustoe.

Humans are just another animal among the millions of species that have come and gone over time. Earth’s pendulum meanwhile, has swung backwards and forwards, seeking a steady stable-state.

The importance of conservation

When I talk about animals as the mechanism for human food security and climate stability, I’m not simply talking about human survival. I’m making the point that the existence of healthy animal populations is what regulates stable climate. Fertile soil, clean water and rich fisheries are all a consequence of conservation. Avoiding mass extinction is linked to the success of animals, including humans, as the two are tightly linked.

The fact is that we are animals. We can’t feed ourselves or have stable climate without all the other animals. This is the reason why we need wildlife conservation. Animals are seen by conservationists as something important to have and many others, as an annoyance. The only thing that will unite the two, is if there is a realisation that animals are in fact, the mechanism for all animal survival, including human animals. 

What could less anthropocentric than that?

patreon banner

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More