Home » Species richness does not equal biodiversity

Species richness does not equal biodiversity

by simon

A symptom of the decline in abundance of species is loss of biodiversity [1] which leads to a destabilisation of ecosystems [2]. Note, the decline is in the abundance, not the number of species.

!!Species diversity DOES NOT EQUAL biodiversity!!

The capacity of animals to transport nutrients from biodiversity hotspots and spread them around the world has declined by 92% on land and 96% in the oceans (Bar-On et al 2018) and humanity has wiped out over 60% of the world’s individual fish, mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians since 1970 (Doughty et al 2015).

The consequence is a reduction in resources and reduced predictability of resources, both of which lead to lowered carrying capacity [3]. This reduction in predictability is caused by release of free surplus energy [4], which upsets the ocean and atmospheric climate, by reintroducing excess heat. This is climate change and it has become the “consumer face” of biodiversity loss.

Loss of biodiversity equally affects animals and primary agriculture (e.g. fisheries and farming) because both depend on the same processes to deliver nutrients at the right time, place and concentration.

Animals amplify nutrient concentrations making it easier for other animals to find food. The life of every animal is a trade-off between energy consumed travelling between places to find food (foraging) and eating (feeding). The same is true for farming, fisheries and even our daily lives. Animal communities amplify and transfer nutrients in bigger patches more reliably and this supports not only entire food chains but the very food economies on which our own civilisation depends. Drawing by Simon Mustoe.

But losing animals also creates a snowball effect, because animals simultaneously feed back into the nutrient cycles. These feed back cycles are what gave us the biodiversity necessary to stabilise ecosystems and deliver fertile soil and rich oceans, in the first place. Animals give and take, whereas primary agriculture mostly just takes.

Therefore, in order to have viable fisheries and farming, you need abundant animals in the right proportions to stabilise ecosystems. Loss of animals will inevitably hasten to decline in human food security.


References

Bar-On, Y., R. Phillips, and R. Milo, The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018. 115: p. 201711842.

Doughty, C., et al., Global nutrient transport in a world of giants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. 113.

patreon banner

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More