by simon
Why are the oceans important? The importance of wildlife.

The importance of the oceans, their wildlife and ecosystems

The land and oceans are part of one system: Earth. So when we ask, why are the oceans important? We’re asking about our own future. Life began in the ocean billions of years before the first plants or animals colonised land. Oceans regulate the state of our atmosphere because they are 99 per cent of the volume of living space for animals and wildlife is the mechanism that drives stability.

Climate change has always been the symptom of biodiversity loss … that’s to say, the breakdown of the complex connectivity between lifeforms that allows Earth to flex in response to changing conditions. Ocean wildlife has, for the large part, acted as a buffer against the most catastrophic effects and since about fifty million years ago, has kept our climate quite stable.

Industrial fishing only happened recently in our planet’s history and this reduction in the abundance of wildlife represents our greatest challenge for survival.

Below you will find a range of articles designed to inspire an understanding of the magnitude of animal impact on our oceans.

What’s more important, the ocean or the land?

The importance we bestow on the land is anthropocentric because we live there. It’s naturally important to us that we protect it. Nonetheless, if life in the ocean dies, we suffer irreversible changes to land-based ecosystems and climate.

In this article, we take a look at many of the ways that land and oceans are linked together.

The answer to the question, ‘why are the oceans important’, is that we live on the land but the oceans regulate Earth’s temperature. The oceans are equally vital to the land we live on.

Latest posts about why the oceans are important

White-tipped Reef Shark. Drawing, Simon Mustoe

Under the heading “Boy, 7, is rushed to hospital in a serious condition after a suspected shark attack at a beach south of Melbourne”, the UK’s Daily Mail reported a “possible shark bite” in southern Victoria (Australia) just recently.

Anecdotal reports suggest it was nothing of the sort. It appears the boy might have stood on a small stingray (and is okay). But as usual, the incident stirred up emotions and for most internet-goers who saw the original post, it will probably remain set in their minds as a shark attack. Media are too consumed with breaking news these days to bother about anything as trivial as fact-checking.

I thought I’d use this as a chance to think about what occurred, because misrepresenting shark attacks can have significant economic impacts and cost lives.

I read once that getting bitten by a shark was less likely than photocopying accident. In any case, very unlikely! Australia is nonetheless renowned for its shark activity and it’s any wonder more isn’t done to discourage swimming when sharks are likely to be in full feeding mode. It would certainly be preferable to the indiscriminate killing of ocean animals and sharks by drum lines and the like.

I personally would feel very uncomfortable swimming on any Australian beach morning or evening and would never put my children in that situation. Anyone who dives, knows the ocean wakes up at that time. As the sun lowers, it gets darker and there is less contrast underwater, which makes it harder for fish to see looming predators. When surf conditions are up (the wind blows offshore), pelagic sharks come in to prospect for prey behind the breakers. The sediment and bubbles thrown up, provide even better conditions for these ambush animals.

Sharks like this White-tipped Reef Shark are common and docile residents of tropical reefs around the world. Very often you see them cruising around in clear sunlit water by day. At night, they turn into voracious hunters. Drawing by Simon Mustoe.

Sharks are extremely fast and impulsive, grabbing at anything they home in on, as potential food, moving in and out between the confusion and the clear water beyond. When they bite, they are temporarily blinded. When you’re chasing incredibly fast food, it helps to have a kill strategy that is pretty swift and decisive.

It’s the same as a big cats hunting in African grassland. You can do walking trips in Africa among big game but everyone is back safe behind doors or fencing, before the sun gets low. There’s a reason we get a heightened sense of perception at those times and why dusk and twilight are associated with human taboos, like ghosts and hauntings. It’s a survival instinct we have built into our psyche from a time when we were predated by megafauna.

We could leverage this understanding and these feelings to teach Australians how to better live among sharks.

Seeing a shark while diving or snorkelling is simply amazing. Generally, diving or snorkelling when the visibility is anything less than about 6-8m* hampers our vision, and is more than enough to remove any advantage a predator might have. Further, sharks aren’t looking to eat people … if they can see what you are, they are quite shy and will flee as soon as they see you.

The majority of dive-related incidents are spear-fishers carrying bait in hip pockets – no need to explain why that’s a bad idea.

When ocean swimmers are bitten (an extremely rare event) it’s often morning/evening or in turbid / rough conditions. I don’t like using the word “attack” as it isn’t what the sharks are doing. Sharks follow routine cycles of behaviour and to some extent, this predicts where and when they are more likely to occur. It’s an adaptation to be the most likely to survive in modern ecosystems and gives us a clue when it’s best to avoid entering the water.

Some incidents in the Whitsundays recently, where people sadly lost their lives, were in areas notably sediment-rich. After rainfall, the water becomes very dirty. Near the mouths of creeks and rivers, this load swirls around, creating corridors of clear water, through which sharks can seek an advantage and search for the tell-tale shapes of potential prey through the landward murk. It’s unwise to swim anywhere off Australia, where freshwater runs into the sea and creates what ecologists call “fronts”. It’s along these edges, that prey concentrates. It’s the perfect storm of conditions that increase the sharks’ probability of hunting successfully. Why would you want to put yourself in among that?

Learning to live with sharks is essential for stable ecosystems and campaigns to alert newcomers to our oceans, of how to avoid dangerous conditions, would almost certainly help save the lives of some unfortunate few. Just as importantly, many many sharks who get a bad wrap for doing what comes naturally, might be saved.

My personal rules to minimise unsuspecting shark encounters are:

  1. Never swim near river mouths or where muddy water empties into the ocean.
  2. Avoid swimming in water where the underwater visibility is less than about 6-8m*.
  3. Never enter high risk locations in the morning or evening, particularly within an hour or so, of dusk and dawn. This is when animals are actively hunting.
  4. Especially in the morning or evening, avoid swimming near the back side of breaking waves (although this is where surfers generally hang out and they tend to be very aware of the risks).

These rules aren’t perfect but they will greatly minimise the risk of encounter. Of course, it will also reduce the time you can spend underwater.

*Underwater visibility cues for predators

I once did a study on the effect of underwater visibility reduction on penguin distribution in Port Phillip Bay. Variation in surface secchi depth in Port Phillip Bay (Melbourne) was 7.33m, (±0.9m 95%CI; n=67; range = 1.4 –14.6m). Little penguins were recorded mostly in areas with 6.18m (4.3‐8.1m) underwater visibility. This range of visibility appears to provide reasonable parity between the ability of the predator to find prey and the ability of prey to escape predation. In other words, beyond about 8m, the penguins lose their ability to hunt, as they do below about 4m. Sharks, like most animals, use a suite of cues to find prey and vision is essential in these tens of metres. Because visibility is limited by sediment load, it is likely to be the same, irrespective of the animal. I suspect this limiting distance applies to most marine vertebrate species.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinRedditWhatsappEmail

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More